Cubic Roots Of Unity: Simplifying Complex Expressions

by Alex Johnson 54 views

In the realm of mathematics, particularly in complex numbers, the cubic roots of unity hold a special significance. These are the numbers that, when cubed, result in 1. Mathematically, they are the solutions to the equation z3=1z^3 = 1. The most common and fundamental representation of these roots is 11, ω\omega, and ω2\omega^2. Here, 11 is the obvious real root, while ω\omega and ω2\omega^2 are complex conjugates. They possess fascinating properties, such as ω3=1\omega^3 = 1, 1+ω+ω2=01 + \omega + \omega^2 = 0, and ω2=ωˉ=1ω\omega^2 = \bar{\omega} = \frac{1}{\omega}. Understanding these properties is crucial for simplifying complex algebraic expressions involving them. Our journey today involves two such expressions, XX and YY, and we aim to find their difference, X−YX-Y, by leveraging the inherent characteristics of these cubic roots of unity. This exploration will not only test our algebraic skills but also deepen our appreciation for the elegance of complex number theory.

Let's dive into the specifics of the problem. We are given X=11+ωiX = \frac{1}{1+\omega i} and Y=ω+i1+ω2iY = \frac{\omega+i}{1+\omega^2 i}. Our objective is to compute X−YX-Y. The presence of ω\omega and ω2\omega^2 suggests that we should aim to simplify these expressions as much as possible before attempting the subtraction. Often, dealing with complex numbers in fractions involves multiplying the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. However, the terms involving ω\omega and ii can make direct application slightly cumbersome. A more strategic approach might be to first manipulate the expressions using the fundamental properties of ω\omega. For instance, we know that 1+ω=−ω21+\omega = -\omega^2 and 1+ω2=−ω1+\omega^2 = -\omega. Substituting these into the denominators could potentially simplify the fractions significantly.

Let's begin by simplifying XX. We have X=11+ωiX = \frac{1}{1+\omega i}. It's not immediately obvious how to simplify this using 1+ω=−ω21+\omega = -\omega^2. However, we can work with the expression directly. To rationalize the denominator, we multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of 1+ωi1+\omega i, which is 1−ωi1 - \omega i. So, X=11+ωi×1−ωi1−ωi=1−ωi(1)2−(ωi)2=1−ωi1−ω2i2X = \frac{1}{1+\omega i} \times \frac{1 - \omega i}{1 - \omega i} = \frac{1 - \omega i}{(1)^2 - (\omega i)^2} = \frac{1 - \omega i}{1 - \omega^2 i^2}. Since i2=−1i^2 = -1, this becomes X=1−ωi1−ω2(−1)=1−ωi1+ω2X = \frac{1 - \omega i}{1 - \omega^2 (-1)} = \frac{1 - \omega i}{1 + \omega^2}. Now, we can use the property 1+ω2=−ω1 + \omega^2 = -\omega. Thus, X=1−ωi−ωX = \frac{1 - \omega i}{-\omega}. This can be further written as X=−1ω+ωiω=−ω2+iX = -\frac{1}{\omega} + \frac{\omega i}{\omega} = -\omega^2 + i. This is a considerably simpler form for XX.

Moving on to the expression for YY, we have Y=ω+i1+ω2iY = \frac{\omega+i}{1+\omega^2 i}. Again, we can try to simplify the denominator using 1+ω2=−ω1+\omega^2 = -\omega. So, Y=ω+i−ωiY = \frac{\omega+i}{-\omega i}. Now, we can split this fraction: Y=ω−ωi+i−ωiY = \frac{\omega}{-\omega i} + \frac{i}{-\omega i}. The first term simplifies to 1−i=i\frac{1}{-i} = i. The second term simplifies to 1−ω=−1ω=−ω2\frac{1}{-\omega} = -\frac{1}{\omega} = -\omega^2. Therefore, Y=i−ω2Y = i - \omega^2. This is also a very simplified form for YY.

With both XX and YY simplified, we can now compute their difference X−YX-Y. We found X=−ω2+iX = -\omega^2 + i and Y=i−ω2Y = i - \omega^2. So, X−Y=(−ω2+i)−(i−ω2)X-Y = (-\omega^2 + i) - (i - \omega^2). Let's distribute the negative sign: X−Y=−ω2+i−i+ω2X-Y = -\omega^2 + i - i + \omega^2. Combining like terms, we see that the ii terms cancel out (i−i=0i - i = 0) and the ω2\omega^2 terms cancel out (−ω2+ω2=0-\omega^2 + \omega^2 = 0). This leaves us with X−Y=0X-Y = 0. It appears that the expressions for XX and YY, despite their initial complex appearance, are actually equal.

Let's double-check our steps to ensure accuracy. The properties of the cubic roots of unity are fundamental: 1+ω+ω2=01+\omega+\omega^2 = 0, which implies 1+ω=−ω21+\omega = -\omega^2 and 1+ω2=−ω1+\omega^2 = -\omega. Also, ω3=1\omega^3 = 1, which implies 1ω=ω2\frac{1}{\omega} = \omega^2 and 1ω2=ω\frac{1}{\omega^2} = \omega. For X=11+ωiX = \frac{1}{1+\omega i}: multiply by conjugate 1−ωi1 - \omega i: X=1−ωi1−(ωi)2=1−ωi1−ω2i2=1−ωi1+ω2X = \frac{1-\omega i}{1-(\omega i)^2} = \frac{1-\omega i}{1-\omega^2 i^2} = \frac{1-\omega i}{1+\omega^2}. Substitute 1+ω2=−ω1+\omega^2 = -\omega: X=1−ωi−ω=−1ω+i=−ω2+iX = \frac{1-\omega i}{-\omega} = -\frac{1}{\omega} + i = -\omega^2 + i. This simplification is correct.

For Y=ω+i1+ω2iY = \frac{\omega+i}{1+\omega^2 i}: substitute 1+ω2=−ω1+\omega^2 = -\omega: Y=ω+i−ωiY = \frac{\omega+i}{-\omega i}. Split the fraction: Y=ω−ωi+i−ωi=−1i−1ωY = \frac{\omega}{-\omega i} + \frac{i}{-\omega i} = -\frac{1}{i} - \frac{1}{\omega}. Since 1i=−i\frac{1}{i} = -i, we have Y=−(−i)−1ω=i−1ωY = -(-i) - \frac{1}{\omega} = i - \frac{1}{\omega}. Since 1ω=ω2\frac{1}{\omega} = \omega^2, we get Y=i−ω2Y = i - \omega^2. This simplification is also correct.

Finally, X−Y=(−ω2+i)−(i−ω2)=−ω2+i−i+ω2=0X-Y = (-\omega^2 + i) - (i - \omega^2) = -\omega^2 + i - i + \omega^2 = 0. The result is indeed 0. This illustrates how a deep understanding of the properties of roots of unity can transform seemingly complicated expressions into manageable ones, revealing underlying symmetries and equalities.

This problem beautifully showcases the power of abstract algebra in simplifying concrete calculations. The cubic roots of unity, 1,ω,ω21, \omega, \omega^2, form a cyclic group under multiplication, and their additive property (1+ω+ω2=01+\omega+\omega^2=0) is a direct consequence of the factorization of z3−1=(z−1)(z2+z+1)z^3-1 = (z-1)(z^2+z+1). The roots of z2+z+1=0z^2+z+1=0 are ω\omega and ω2\omega^2. The fact that XX and YY simplified to expressions that are essentially identical (−ω2+i-\omega^2+i and i−ω2i-\omega^2) is not a coincidence but a testament to the structure imposed by these roots. Such problems are common in introductory abstract algebra and complex analysis courses, serving as excellent exercises for students to practice manipulating these fundamental concepts. The use of ii, the imaginary unit, further integrates the problem into the domain of complex numbers, where these roots naturally reside.

The elegance of this solution encourages further exploration into similar problems. One might wonder what happens if we change the powers of ω\omega or introduce other roots of unity. For example, what if we considered the fifth roots of unity? Or what if the expressions involved higher powers of ii? The algebraic techniques used here, such as multiplying by conjugates and substituting known identities, are versatile. They can be applied to a wide range of problems in number theory, abstract algebra, and signal processing, where roots of unity play a crucial role in Fourier analysis and other applications. The abstract nature of roots of unity allows them to represent periodic phenomena, making them indispensable tools in various scientific and engineering disciplines.

Exploring these concepts can lead to a deeper appreciation for the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas. The properties of roots of unity are not isolated facts but are deeply embedded within the structure of fields and rings. For instance, the field extension Q(ω)\mathbb{Q}(\omega) is a cyclotomic field, a topic of extensive study in algebraic number theory. The minimal polynomial of ω\omega over Q\mathbb{Q} is x2+x+1x^2+x+1. Understanding these connections can open up pathways to advanced mathematical topics and reveal the profound beauty and utility of abstract mathematical structures.

In conclusion, by carefully applying the properties of the cubic roots of unity, we have successfully simplified the expressions for XX and YY and found their difference to be zero. This exercise highlights the importance of algebraic manipulation and the unique characteristics of these special complex numbers. For further reading on the fascinating world of complex numbers and roots of unity, you can explore resources like Wikipedia's page on the Roots of Unity or delve into introductory complex analysis textbooks.