Find The Inverse Of G(x) = -3(x+6)

by Alex Johnson 35 views

Unraveling the Concept of Inverse Functions

Welcome, math enthusiasts! Today, we're going to tackle a common question that pops up in the world of algebra: "What is the inverse of the function g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x)=-3(x+6)?" It might sound a bit intimidating at first, but understanding inverse functions is a fundamental skill that unlocks deeper mathematical understanding. Essentially, an inverse function acts as a 'undo' button for the original function. If a function takes an input and produces an output, its inverse takes that output and returns the original input. Think of it like putting on your socks and then your shoes; the inverse operation would be taking off your shoes and then your socks. We'll be using this principle to find the inverse of g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6), breaking down the process step-by-step so you can confidently tackle similar problems. This exploration isn't just about solving one specific equation; it's about building a robust understanding of how functions and their inverses interact, a concept crucial in calculus, pre-calculus, and many other areas of mathematics.

Step-by-Step Guide to Finding the Inverse of g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6)

Let's get down to business and find the inverse of our specific function, g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6). The journey to finding an inverse function typically involves three key steps, and we'll meticulously follow them. First, we replace g(x)g(x) with the variable yy. This is purely a notational change to make the algebraic manipulation easier to follow. So, our function now looks like: y=βˆ’3(x+6)y = -3(x+6). The second crucial step is to swap the roles of xx and yy. This is the core of finding an inverse – we're essentially reversing the input and output. So, wherever we see yy, we replace it with xx, and wherever we see xx, we replace it with yy. This gives us: x=βˆ’3(y+6)x = -3(y+6). The third and final step is to solve this new equation for yy. Our goal here is to isolate yy on one side of the equation, which will then represent our inverse function. We'll start by dividing both sides by βˆ’3-3 to get rid of the multiplier outside the parentheses: rac{x}{-3} = y+6. Now, to get yy all by itself, we subtract 6 from both sides: rac{x}{-3} - 6 = y. And there you have it! The expression on the right side is our inverse function. Conventionally, we denote the inverse of a function gg as gβˆ’1(x)g^{-1}(x). Therefore, the inverse of g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6) is g^{-1}(x) = rac{x}{-3} - 6. You might also see this written as g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6, which is mathematically equivalent and perhaps a bit cleaner to look at. The process itself is systematic and applicable to a wide range of functions, making it a powerful tool in your mathematical arsenal.

Verifying Your Inverse Function: The Importance of Composition

So, we've found our potential inverse function, g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6. But how do we know for sure that it's correct? The gold standard for verifying an inverse function lies in a concept called function composition. When you compose a function with its inverse, you should always end up with the original input variable, xx. This means that if we plug our inverse function into the original function, we should get xx, and if we plug the original function into the inverse function, we should also get xx. Let's test this with our g(x)g(x) and gβˆ’1(x)g^{-1}(x).

Composition 1: g(gβˆ’1(x))g(g^{-1}(x))

Here, we're going to substitute our entire inverse function, gβˆ’1(x)g^{-1}(x), into the input of our original function, g(x)g(x). Remember, g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6). So, wherever we see an 'xx' in g(x)g(x), we're going to replace it with the expression - rac{x}{3} - 6.

g(g^{-1}(x)) = -3ig((- rac{x}{3} - 6) + 6ig)

Notice how the βˆ’6-6 and +6+6 inside the parentheses cancel each other out:

g(g^{-1}(x)) = -3ig(- rac{x}{3}ig)

Now, we multiply βˆ’3-3 by - rac{x}{3}. The negatives cancel, and the 3s cancel:

g(gβˆ’1(x))=xg(g^{-1}(x)) = x

Success! The first composition yielded xx, which is exactly what we wanted. This is a strong indicator that our inverse function is correct.

Composition 2: gβˆ’1(g(x))g^{-1}(g(x))

Now, let's perform the composition in the other direction. We'll substitute our original function, g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6), into the input of our inverse function, g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6. So, wherever we see an 'xx' in gβˆ’1(x)g^{-1}(x), we'll replace it with the entire expression βˆ’3(x+6)-3(x+6).

g^{-1}(g(x)) = rac{-3(x+6)}{3} - 6

Here, we can simplify the fraction rac{-3(x+6)}{3}. The 3 in the denominator cancels with the βˆ’3-3 in the numerator, leaving us with βˆ’1-1 times (x+6)(x+6):

gβˆ’1(g(x))=βˆ’1(x+6)βˆ’6g^{-1}(g(x)) = -1(x+6) - 6

Distribute the βˆ’1-1 into the parentheses:

gβˆ’1(g(x))=βˆ’xβˆ’6βˆ’6g^{-1}(g(x)) = -x - 6 - 6

Finally, combine the constant terms:

gβˆ’1(g(x))=βˆ’xβˆ’12g^{-1}(g(x)) = -x - 12

Wait a minute! This didn't result in xx. What went wrong? This is a crucial learning moment! Let's re-examine our steps. Ah, the issue lies in a potential misunderstanding of the problem or a simple arithmetic slip. The purpose of composition is to verify. If one composition yields xx, and the other doesn't, it usually points to an error in either the original function's calculation or the inverse calculation, or the function itself might not have a true inverse (though linear functions like this one always do). Let's re-trace our steps for gβˆ’1(g(x))g^{-1}(g(x)) very carefully.

Re-evaluating gβˆ’1(g(x))g^{-1}(g(x)):

Original g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6). Our found inverse g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6. Let's try substituting g(x)g(x) into gβˆ’1(x)g^{-1}(x) again.

gβˆ’1(g(x))=gβˆ’1(βˆ’3(x+6))g^{-1}(g(x)) = g^{-1}(-3(x+6))

Now substitute βˆ’3(x+6)-3(x+6) for xx in g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6:

g^{-1}(-3(x+6)) = rac{-3(x+6)}{3} - 6

Simplify the fraction:

=βˆ’(x+6)βˆ’6= -(x+6) - 6

Distribute the negative sign:

=βˆ’xβˆ’6βˆ’6= -x - 6 - 6

Combine the constants:

=βˆ’xβˆ’12= -x - 12

Correction and Clarification: My apologies for the confusion in the previous section! It seems I made a mistake during the second composition check, which is a very real possibility when working through these problems. The correct result for gβˆ’1(g(x))g^{-1}(g(x)) should indeed be xx. Let's trace where the error occurred. Upon closer inspection of the calculation for g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6), distributing the βˆ’3-3 first yields g(x)=βˆ’3xβˆ’18g(x) = -3x - 18. Now, let's find the inverse of this form.

  1. Replace g(x)g(x) with yy: y=βˆ’3xβˆ’18y = -3x - 18
  2. Swap xx and yy: x=βˆ’3yβˆ’18x = -3y - 18
  3. Solve for yy: x+18=βˆ’3yx + 18 = -3y rac{x + 18}{-3} = y y = - rac{x + 18}{3} y = - rac{x}{3} - rac{18}{3} y = - rac{x}{3} - 6

This confirms that our initial calculation of g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6 was correct! The error was in my manual execution of the second composition check, gβˆ’1(g(x))g^{-1}(g(x)). Let's redo that check with the correctly identified inverse.

The True Composition Check: gβˆ’1(g(x))g^{-1}(g(x))

We have g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6) and g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6.

Substitute g(x)g(x) into gβˆ’1(x)g^{-1}(x):

gβˆ’1(g(x))=gβˆ’1(βˆ’3(x+6))g^{-1}(g(x)) = g^{-1}(-3(x+6))

Now, use the rule for gβˆ’1(x)g^{-1}(x), which is to take the input, divide it by βˆ’3-3, and then subtract 6.

Input is βˆ’3(x+6)-3(x+6).

g^{-1}(-3(x+6)) = rac{-3(x+6)}{-3} - 6

Simplify the fraction. The βˆ’3-3 in the numerator and the βˆ’3-3 in the denominator cancel out:

=(x+6)βˆ’6= (x+6) - 6

Now, subtract 6:

=x+6βˆ’6= x + 6 - 6

=x= x

Excellent! Both compositions, g(gβˆ’1(x))=xg(g^{-1}(x)) = x and gβˆ’1(g(x))=xg^{-1}(g(x)) = x, have now correctly yielded xx. This dual confirmation is the definitive proof that g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6 is indeed the correct inverse function for g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6). This process of verification through composition is not just a formality; it's a critical step that solidifies your understanding and catches potential errors. It's a testament to the elegance of mathematics where operations perfectly undo each other when dealing with inverse relationships.

Why Understanding Inverse Functions Matters

Beyond the satisfaction of solving a mathematical puzzle, understanding inverse functions has profound implications across various fields. In computer science, cryptography heavily relies on one-way functions and their inverses. Certain mathematical operations are easy to compute in one direction but incredibly difficult to reverse, forming the basis of secure communication. For instance, multiplying two large prime numbers is easy, but factoring a very large number into its prime components is computationally intensive – this asymmetry is key to modern encryption. In calculus, inverse functions are fundamental to understanding concepts like differentiation and integration. The derivative of an inverse function has a specific relationship to the derivative of the original function, a theorem that simplifies complex integration problems. Furthermore, many common functions have well-known inverse counterparts. The inverse of the exponential function exe^x is the natural logarithm $ ext{ln}(x)$, and the inverse of $ ext{sin}(x)$ is $ ext{arcsin}(x)$ (or $ ext{sin}^{-1}(x)$). Understanding these relationships allows us to switch perspectives and solve problems more efficiently. For example, solving exponential equations often involves using logarithms, which are their inverses. The ability to recognize and work with inverse functions equips you with a more versatile toolkit for problem-solving, enabling you to approach challenges from multiple angles and choose the most effective path to a solution. It's a core concept that bridges foundational algebra with more advanced mathematical applications.

Conclusion: Mastering the Inverse

We've successfully navigated the process of finding the inverse of the function g(x)=βˆ’3(x+6)g(x) = -3(x+6), arriving at g^{-1}(x) = - rac{x}{3} - 6. More importantly, we've delved into why this process works and the critical role of composition in verifying our solution. Remember the key steps: replace g(x)g(x) with yy, swap xx and yy, and then solve for yy. The verification through composition, g(gβˆ’1(x))=xg(g^{-1}(x)) = x and gβˆ’1(g(x))=xg^{-1}(g(x)) = x, provides the ultimate confidence in our answer. Inverse functions are not just abstract mathematical concepts; they are powerful tools that have practical applications in fields ranging from computer science to calculus. Keep practicing these techniques, and don't be afraid of the occasional mix-up during composition checks – it's all part of the learning journey! If you're looking to deepen your understanding of functions and their inverses, exploring resources on function transformations and algebraic manipulation can be incredibly beneficial.

For further exploration into the fascinating world of functions and their inverses, I highly recommend checking out resources from Khan Academy, a fantastic platform offering free courses and practice exercises on a vast array of mathematical topics, including detailed explanations of inverse functions.